🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a rising group of countries are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and apps are "taking away our kids' youth". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on parliament to enact a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to block their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a good first step," commented the MEP supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the regional government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to mimic this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, global agencies take a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

As this international discussion unfolds, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are no longer content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.